isiahl | 8 comments | 9 hours ago
seanwilson | 1 comment | 3 hours ago
USWDS have a cool palette system where color pairs from their palette have predictable WCAG color contrast (unlike in e.g. Tailwind's default palette), but I rarely hear of projects using USWDS colors:
https://designsystem.digital.gov/design-tokens/color/overvie...
> We call the difference in grade between any two colors the magic number. Magic numbers have the following contrast implications:
> A magic number of 40+ results in WCAG 2.0 AA Large Text contrast (example: gray-90 and indigo-warm-50v).
Maxious | 1 comment | 2 hours ago
Within 60 days "“diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the Federal Government" must be terminated https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/endi...
seanwilson | 0 comments | 50 minutes ago
I didn't have "does this include words in it that might get banned?" on my checklist when hunting for a good domain name haha. The https://designsystem.digital.gov/design-tokens/color/overvie... link still mentions "inclusively".
> Within 60 days "“diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility”
Are there more details on this? So next USWDS might be stripping out references to WCAG accessibility guidelines like their color contrast advice?
hn_user82179 | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
lmeyerov | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
This applies equally to institutions and individuals, so from investors to CEOs to politicians to tech community leaders to individuals picking where they work, this is a very "interesting" time
Both the USDS and PIF programs were inspiring to me as they were almost like a New Deal for digital natives & coders. They did a good job of attracting smart hard workers to be underpaid for unglamorous & often-frustrating but impactful work. A lot of good people!
righthand | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
I would have loved serving my country and working on software as a way to give back.
ronbenton | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
righthand | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
atonse | 0 comments | 5 hours ago
At least that’s what was pitched to me a few years ago when I spoke to their counterparts in the US gov. Incredibly smart, no-BS people that wanted to do good work and have high impact.
Still the only job I regret not taking in all my career.
boris-ning-usds | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
ipython | 0 comments | 5 hours ago
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
kevml | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
xnx | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
woodylondon | 1 comment | 31 minutes ago
It depends on why you want this - not building government sites, but it is still valid for general use as well.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-digital-data-...
heidarb | 0 comments | 13 seconds ago
The UK kind of pioneered doing digital services in government well with GDS, 10+ years ago.
Some of the people who were central to the effort have gone to consult other governments on how to do the same.
dang | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
USDS Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25595830 - Dec 2020 (98 comments)
Staying with the US Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13432881 - Jan 2017 (236 comments)
A brief update - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11927447 - June 2016 (169 comments)
Ask HN: What have the USDS and 18F accomplished so far? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10612779 - Nov 2015 (12 comments)
The US digital service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10060858 - Aug 2015 (292 comments)
Back to SF After the U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9800276 - June 2015 (160 comments)
I’ve Joined the White House’s U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9286906 - March 2015 (116 comments)
Join the U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8988819 - Feb 2015 (233 comments)
The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8216419 - Aug 2014 (9 comments)
The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164676 - Aug 2014 (10 comments)
White House launches “U.S. Digital Service,” with HealthCare.gov fixer at helm - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164523 - Aug 2014 (139 comments)
The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164461 - Aug 2014 (1 comment)
ronbenton | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
(also thank you for all you do here)
dang | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
Not sure I understand what you're asking. Your post was fine and was not penalized (edit: sorry, this was not true—see below)—it's true that we downweight dupes, but once a year or more has gone by, we consider reposts to be dupes any more. Does that answer your question?
Edit: Oh, I get it now. Yes, I downweighted this thread as a follow-up, because it's obviously related to the Major Ongoing Topic (MOT) of Doge etc. In cases like that, follow-ups aren't the greatest posts; usually it's better to post the link as a comment in one of the other threads.
You can find lots of past explanation about this here:
major ongoing topics - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
downweighting follow-ups - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
However, I thought your submission was a good one, so I downweighted it quite a bit less than we normally would.