Digital Services Playbook

https://playbook.usds.gov/

By ronbenton at

isiahl | 8 comments | 9 hours ago
RIP to the USDS, an inspiring government department to someone like me.
seanwilson | 1 comment | 3 hours ago
They're behind U.S. Web Design System (USWDS)? This is going away?

USWDS have a cool palette system where color pairs from their palette have predictable WCAG color contrast (unlike in e.g. Tailwind's default palette), but I rarely hear of projects using USWDS colors:

https://designsystem.digital.gov/design-tokens/color/overvie...

> We call the difference in grade between any two colors the magic number. Magic numbers have the following contrast implications:

> A magic number of 40+ results in WCAG 2.0 AA Large Text contrast (example: gray-90 and indigo-warm-50v).

Maxious | 1 comment | 2 hours ago
Under Executive Order 14151 "Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing" many links/pages were already removed from the design system https://github.com/uswds/uswds-site/pull/3078 https://github.com/uswds/uswds-site/pull/3053/files#diff-86c... (ie. inclusivecolors.com would be prohibited)

Within 60 days "“diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the Federal Government" must be terminated https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/endi...

seanwilson | 0 comments | 50 minutes ago
> (ie. inclusivecolors.com would be prohibited)

I didn't have "does this include words in it that might get banned?" on my checklist when hunting for a good domain name haha. The https://designsystem.digital.gov/design-tokens/color/overvie... link still mentions "inclusively".

> Within 60 days "“diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility”

Are there more details on this? So next USWDS might be stripping out references to WCAG accessibility guidelines like their color contrast advice?

hn_user82179 | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
Yep. I’ve been subscribed to get emails when application to their jobs open, because they really represented a portion of the government that I thought was doing good work and was an area I could contribute meaningfully to (given my skillset). I never made the jump, it was such a large paycut and iirc looked like it’d require relocation, but I’d like to think I might in the future (if it ever comes back).
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
The people I met at USDS took that kind of pay cut for the mission, which I was in awe of. Senior, Staff, Principal engineers from big tech who likely had been making twice as much as top government salary.
lmeyerov | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
"It takes 20 years to build a reputation and 5 minutes to ruin it"

This applies equally to institutions and individuals, so from investors to CEOs to politicians to tech community leaders to individuals picking where they work, this is a very "interesting" time

Both the USDS and PIF programs were inspiring to me as they were almost like a New Deal for digital natives & coders. They did a good job of attracting smart hard workers to be underpaid for unglamorous & often-frustrating but impactful work. A lot of good people!

righthand | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
I wanted to work for them since Obama announced it, but they didn’t pay as well as a big funded private corp startup. If I was a bit older and more comfortable with my savings I would have.

I would have loved serving my country and working on software as a way to give back.

ronbenton | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
I talked to some people at USDS during my time in govt. They took a 50% pay cut to serve their country. Wish more people understood a lot of civil servants often do it for the mission.
righthand | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
There is a sad side to my desire, I’ve told people this before in social circles and most people respond with confusion as to why I would want to do that.
atonse | 0 comments | 5 hours ago
The general expectation with USDS and others was that you only stay for 2-3 years. So it’s more like a temporary tour.

At least that’s what was pitched to me a few years ago when I spoke to their counterparts in the US gov. Incredibly smart, no-BS people that wanted to do good work and have high impact.

Still the only job I regret not taking in all my career.

boris-ning-usds | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
We'll live on in people's memories and hearts. Thank you.
ipython | 0 comments | 5 hours ago
Thank you for your service.
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
I wanted to join them some day. Hopefully they will be back.
kevml | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
I wanted to join them a few years ago but I wasn’t in the right life position to do so. I was hoping to one day in the near future. Maybe that day will one day come again.
xnx | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
I assume this link is being shared now to encourage backups before it is deleted.
ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
I shared it because I am still sad about the loss of USDS. I wanted to join it some day. I am holding out hope it will be back one day.
woodylondon | 1 comment | 31 minutes ago
I have never seen this before, and it is both interesting and generally useful to see how others put this sort of content together, but it got me thinking: is there a UK version of this? I found the following.

It depends on why you want this - not building government sites, but it is still valid for general use as well.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-digital-data-...

heidarb | 0 comments | 13 seconds ago
As far as I know the US one is heavily inspired by the UK one.

The UK kind of pioneered doing digital services in government well with GDS, 10+ years ago.

Some of the people who were central to the effort have gone to consult other governments on how to do the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Digital_Service

dang | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
Related. Others?

USDS Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25595830 - Dec 2020 (98 comments)

Staying with the US Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13432881 - Jan 2017 (236 comments)

A brief update - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11927447 - June 2016 (169 comments)

Ask HN: What have the USDS and 18F accomplished so far? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10612779 - Nov 2015 (12 comments)

The US digital service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10060858 - Aug 2015 (292 comments)

Back to SF After the U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9800276 - June 2015 (160 comments)

I’ve Joined the White House’s U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9286906 - March 2015 (116 comments)

Join the U.S. Digital Service - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8988819 - Feb 2015 (233 comments)

The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8216419 - Aug 2014 (9 comments)

The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164676 - Aug 2014 (10 comments)

White House launches “U.S. Digital Service,” with HealthCare.gov fixer at helm - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164523 - Aug 2014 (139 comments)

The U.S. Digital Services Playbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8164461 - Aug 2014 (1 comment)

ronbenton | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
Hi dang can I ask do redundant links get penalty on top list? I noticed when you commented this the post dropped down the front page quite a bit

(also thank you for all you do here)

dang | 1 comment | 8 hours ago
> do redundant links get penalty on top list?

Not sure I understand what you're asking. Your post was fine and was not penalized (edit: sorry, this was not true—see below)—it's true that we downweight dupes, but once a year or more has gone by, we consider reposts to be dupes any more. Does that answer your question?

Edit: Oh, I get it now. Yes, I downweighted this thread as a follow-up, because it's obviously related to the Major Ongoing Topic (MOT) of Doge etc. In cases like that, follow-ups aren't the greatest posts; usually it's better to post the link as a comment in one of the other threads.

You can find lots of past explanation about this here:

major ongoing topics - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

downweighting follow-ups - https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

However, I thought your submission was a good one, so I downweighted it quite a bit less than we normally would.

ronbenton | 0 comments | 8 hours ago
Okay, thank you for the detailed explanation!
andreygrehov | 0 comments | 7 hours ago